Information
for curious and
not quite smart people

Cognitive Biases: A Classification and Description

Content
1. Information Processing.
2. Judgment and Decision-Making Biases.
3. Social and Interpersonal Biases.
4. Memory Biases.
5. Cognitive Consistency and Reduction Biases.
6. Importance and Impact.

This is a nice picture INTRODUCTION Cognitive biases are systematic errors in thinking that affect our judgment.
These biases are deeply rooted in our cognitive architecture and influence how we perceive, process, and remember information.
Here is a comprehensive overview of some of the most well-known cognitive biases, divided into different categories.

1. Information Processing and Perception Biases

a. Availability Heuristic

The availability heuristic describes the tendency to judge the probability of an event based on how easily examples come to mind.
When events are easily recalled, we tend to consider them more frequent or probable.
This can lead to an overestimation of the likelihood of dramatic or heavily reported events.
Example 1: After a plane crash that is heavily reported in the media, many people overestimate the risk of plane crashes, even though they are statistically rare.
Example 2: If a person has several friends who have developed cancer, they might overestimate how common cancer is, because these cases are very present in their memory. This is a nice picture

b. Confirmation Bias

Confirmation bias describes the tendency to select and interpret information in a way that confirms one's own expectations and beliefs.
People tend to ignore or undervalue information that contradicts their beliefs, leading to a reinforcement of existing views.
Example 1: An investor who is convinced that a particular company will be successful actively seeks out positive news about the company and ignores negative reports.
Example 2: Someone who believes in conspiracy theories interprets neutral or contradictory information in a way that supports their beliefs rather than questioning them.

2. Judgment and Decision-Making Biases

a. Anchoring

The anchoring effect occurs when people fixate too heavily on the first piece of information (the "anchor") presented when making numerical estimates.
Even if this value is random, it significantly influences subsequent estimates.
This is a nice picture Example 1: A seller quotes a very high price for a car to then offer a "discount." The buyer is led to think they are getting a good deal, even though the final price is still high.
Example 2: During a salary negotiation, the employer starts with a low offer that serves as an anchor, causing the employee to ultimately accept a lower salary than originally intended.

b. Overconfidence Bias

Overconfidence bias describes the tendency of people to overestimate their own abilities or the accuracy of their judgments.
This can lead to risky decisions and miscalculations.
Example 1: An amateur trader is convinced they can beat the stock market and invests aggressively without fully understanding the risks, often resulting in losses.
Example 2: A student believes they don't need to study much for an exam because they are confident they know the material, and then receives a lower grade than expected.

c. Loss Aversion

Loss aversion describes the tendency to weigh losses more heavily than gains.
People feel the pain of a loss more intensely than the pleasure of an equivalent gain, which can lead to risk aversion in decision-making situations.
Example 1: An investor holds onto a bad investment because they don't want to realize the loss, even though it would be more rational to invest the money in a better option.
Example 2: A gambler at a casino is willing to risk more money to recover lost funds than they were initially willing to risk at the start of the game. This is a nice picture

3. Social and Interpersonal Biases

a. Fundamental Attribution Error

The fundamental attribution error describes the tendency to attribute others' behavior more to their personal traits than to situational factors.
In contrast, we tend to explain our own behavior more by the situation.
Example 1: If someone is late to a meeting, one might assume that this person is unreliable rather than considering external factors such as traffic.
Example 2: A manager might perceive an employee who did not complete a project on time as lazy, without considering that the employee might have been hindered by external factors such as technical problems.

b. Halo Effect

The halo effect occurs when the perception of a positive or negative trait of a person distorts our overall perception of that person.
A single positive trait can lead us to rate other attributes of the person more positively.
Example 1: A good-looking job applicant is perceived as more competent and likable during an interview, even though their qualifications are no better than those of other applicants.
Example 2: If a teacher likes a student due to good performance in one subject, they may tend to rate the student's performance in other subjects more positively as well. This is a nice picture

4. Memory Biases

a. Hindsight Bias

Hindsight bias describes the tendency to believe, after an event has occurred, that one would have foreseen it.
This bias leads us to perceive past events as more predictable than they actually were.
Example 1: After an election loss of a candidate, many voters believe they foresaw the outcome, even though they were uncertain before the election.
Example 2: After an accident, many people think that the signs of the accident were obvious and that they should have seen it coming.

b. False Memory

False memory describes the tendency to remember events that never occurred or that are distorted.
This bias can arise from suggestion, misinformation, or the reconstruction of memory contents.
Example 1: After reading a report about a bank robbery, witnesses remember details that were never mentioned because their memory was distorted by suggestions.
Example 2: A person remembers experiencing an event in their childhood that never actually happened because they reconstructed the memory incorrectly from stories and photos. This is a nice picture

5. Cognitive Consistency and Reduction Biases

a. Cognitive Dissonance

Cognitive dissonance occurs when we experience conflicting beliefs or behaviors.
To reduce this internal conflict, we tend to change our beliefs or justify our behavior to achieve consistency.
Example 1: A smoker who knows that smoking is harmful justifies their behavior by downplaying studies or saying that smoking relaxes them.
Example 2: Someone who bought an expensive product and realizes that it does not meet expectations convinces themselves that the purchase was still worthwhile to avoid the unpleasant feeling of a bad investment.

b. Effort Justification

Effort justification describes the tendency to justify the efforts and costs we have invested in a particular task by overestimating the value or importance of the outcome.
Example 1: A student who has invested many hours preparing for a difficult course tends to rate the course as more valuable and interesting, regardless of the actual benefit of the course.
Example 2: After a strenuous climb, hikers rate the view from the top as more impressive because they want to justify the effort they put in to get there. This is a nice picture

Importance and Impact

Cognitive biases play a crucial role in many aspects of daily life, including decision-making, social interactions, and self-perception.
They often unconsciously influence our judgments and can have both positive and negative effects.

Positive Aspects:

-Efficiency:

Cognitive biases often enable quick and efficient decisions in complex and uncertain situations.

-Adaptation:

In many cases, biases can offer adaptive advantages by adjusting our behavior to frequently occurring circumstances.

Negative Aspects:

-Poor Decisions:

Biases can lead to systematic errors and suboptimal decisions.

-Prejudices:

They can reinforce prejudices and discrimination by distorting our judgment about other people.

Dealing with Cognitive Biases

Awareness of cognitive biases is the first step to mitigating them.
Some strategies to reduce their impact include:

-Critical Thinking:

Active reflection and questioning of one's own beliefs and decisions.

-Diversification of Information Sources:

Using diverse and contradictory sources of information to minimize confirmation bias.

-Systematic Decision-Making Processes:

Using structured methods for decision-making, such as checklists and algorithms, to reduce the influence of biases.
This is a nice picture

Conclusion

Cognitive biases are a fundamental part of our mental processes and influence how we understand and respond to the world around us.
While they can be useful in many cases, they often lead to misjudgments and suboptimal decisions.
By being aware of and applying strategies to mitigate their impact, we can learn to think better and more rationally.